<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for New Now Know How</title>
	<atom:link href="http://benkraal.wordpress.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://benkraal.wordpress.com</link>
	<description>Ben Kraal</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 Sep 2009 06:38:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on On Expertise and Process by Ben</title>
		<link>http://benkraal.wordpress.com/2009/08/18/on-expertise-and-process/#comment-3244</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Sep 2009 06:38:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://benkraal.wordpress.com/?p=317#comment-3244</guid>
		<description>Hello UX Australia newsletter recipients!

The newsletter linked here with the words &quot;why experts don&#039;t have to use process as much as novices&quot;. Which is sort of true.

But I would rather have it said that what I meant was &quot;why experts don&#039;t &lt;em&gt;seem to&lt;/em&gt; have to use process as much as novices&quot;. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello UX Australia newsletter recipients!</p>
<p>The newsletter linked here with the words &#8220;why experts don&#8217;t have to use process as much as novices&#8221;. Which is sort of true.</p>
<p>But I would rather have it said that what I meant was &#8220;why experts don&#8217;t <em>seem to</em> have to use process as much as novices&#8221;. <img src='http://s.wordpress.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on On Expertise and Process by Donna Spencer</title>
		<link>http://benkraal.wordpress.com/2009/08/18/on-expertise-and-process/#comment-3243</link>
		<dc:creator>Donna Spencer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Sep 2009 06:04:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://benkraal.wordpress.com/?p=317#comment-3243</guid>
		<description>Awesome explanation</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Awesome explanation</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Looking for Expertise in Physical Interactions by Johnny Holland - It&#8217;s all about interaction &#187; Blog Archive &#187; UX Australia &#8216;09 report: Day 1</title>
		<link>http://benkraal.wordpress.com/2007/12/05/looking-for-expertise-in-physical-interactions/#comment-3241</link>
		<dc:creator>Johnny Holland - It&#8217;s all about interaction &#187; Blog Archive &#187; UX Australia &#8216;09 report: Day 1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2009 11:47:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://benkraal.wordpress.com/2007/12/05/looking-for-expertise-in-physical-interactions/#comment-3241</guid>
		<description>[...] to be able to see the processes of how they work at a glance). For more on the project, check out Krall&#8217;s blog or look at the OZCHI [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] to be able to see the processes of how they work at a glance). For more on the project, check out Krall&#8217;s blog or look at the OZCHI [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Launchy: Append text to a file from anywhere by Quick sending todos from work to home. &#171; icdark&#8217;s blog</title>
		<link>http://benkraal.wordpress.com/2007/05/16/launchy-append-text-to-a-file-from-anywhere/#comment-3212</link>
		<dc:creator>Quick sending todos from work to home. &#171; icdark&#8217;s blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2009 18:13:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://benkraal.wordpress.com/2007/05/16/launchy-append-text-to-a-file-from-anywhere/#comment-3212</guid>
		<description>[...] I&#8217;ve added a command to Launchy that appends file when I use command &#8216;do&#8217; (http://benkraal.wordpress.com/2007/05/16/launchy-append-text-to-a-file-from-anywhere/). Normally I use QuickSilver on a Mac and this feature is available from [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I&#8217;ve added a command to Launchy that appends file when I use command &#8216;do&#8217; (<a href="http://benkraal.wordpress.com/2007/05/16/launchy-append-text-to-a-file-from-anywhere/" rel="nofollow">http://benkraal.wordpress.com/2007/05/16/launchy-append-text-to-a-file-from-anywhere/</a>). Normally I use QuickSilver on a Mac and this feature is available from [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Launchy: Append text to a file from anywhere by Wesley Rice</title>
		<link>http://benkraal.wordpress.com/2007/05/16/launchy-append-text-to-a-file-from-anywhere/#comment-3209</link>
		<dc:creator>Wesley Rice</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jan 2009 17:47:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://benkraal.wordpress.com/2007/05/16/launchy-append-text-to-a-file-from-anywhere/#comment-3209</guid>
		<description>Nice hack, Ben!

I&#039;ve made a slight adjustment that also inserts the current date and time, along with the text to append. The instructions are &lt;a href=&quot;http://sagehacks.blogspot.com/2009/01/howto-make-launchy-your-slave.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice hack, Ben!</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve made a slight adjustment that also inserts the current date and time, along with the text to append. The instructions are <a href="http://sagehacks.blogspot.com/2009/01/howto-make-launchy-your-slave.html" rel="nofollow">here</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Launchy: Append text to a file from anywhere by Chuchu</title>
		<link>http://benkraal.wordpress.com/2007/05/16/launchy-append-text-to-a-file-from-anywhere/#comment-3194</link>
		<dc:creator>Chuchu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Sep 2008 05:49:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://benkraal.wordpress.com/2007/05/16/launchy-append-text-to-a-file-from-anywhere/#comment-3194</guid>
		<description>Came here thru lifehacker. Thanks for the tip.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Came here thru lifehacker. Thanks for the tip.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on LA is less dense than NYC by Los Angeles is more dense than New York &#171; Ben Kraal</title>
		<link>http://benkraal.wordpress.com/2008/02/06/la-is-less-dense-than-nyc/#comment-3192</link>
		<dc:creator>Los Angeles is more dense than New York &#171; Ben Kraal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 01:49:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://benkraal.wordpress.com/?p=275#comment-3192</guid>
		<description>[...] LA is less dense than NYC &#171; making the ordinary 2.6.08 / 2pm [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] LA is less dense than NYC &laquo; making the ordinary 2.6.08 / 2pm [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Los Angeles is more dense than New York by Ben Kraal</title>
		<link>http://benkraal.wordpress.com/2008/02/05/los-angeles-is-more-dense-than-new-york/#comment-3191</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben Kraal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Sep 2008 21:11:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://benkraal.wordpress.com/?p=274#comment-3191</guid>
		<description>Thank you for your intelligent and well reasoned rebuttal.

However, you will notice that the comment/trackback above the one you made is from the next post in this blog which points to the &lt;a href=&quot;http://robertmcdonald.info/blog/2008/02/la_is_not_denser_than_new_york_1.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;excellent rebuttal&lt;/a&gt; to my post by &lt;a href=&quot;http://robertmcdonald.info/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Robert McDonald&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for your intelligent and well reasoned rebuttal.</p>
<p>However, you will notice that the comment/trackback above the one you made is from the next post in this blog which points to the <a href="http://robertmcdonald.info/blog/2008/02/la_is_not_denser_than_new_york_1.html" rel="nofollow">excellent rebuttal</a> to my post by <a href="http://robertmcdonald.info/" rel="nofollow">Robert McDonald</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Los Angeles is more dense than New York by LA Is less dense</title>
		<link>http://benkraal.wordpress.com/2008/02/05/los-angeles-is-more-dense-than-new-york/#comment-3190</link>
		<dc:creator>LA Is less dense</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Sep 2008 15:33:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://benkraal.wordpress.com/?p=274#comment-3190</guid>
		<description>get your facts straight, no its not.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>get your facts straight, no its not.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The People&#8217;s Car? by joe</title>
		<link>http://benkraal.wordpress.com/2008/02/24/the-peoples-car/#comment-3189</link>
		<dc:creator>joe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2008 15:30:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://benkraal.wordpress.com/?p=280#comment-3189</guid>
		<description>i dont quite see how the r4 can be compared to the 2cv, the 2cv came out in 1948, and was still in production in 1990! well untill july... but the r4 was just renaults answer to the 2cv, they even tried to give it a flat twin! and it has a dashboard mounted gear stick! which has always been the 2cvs original feature since the start, the 2cv had been around for over 20 years before renault came up with the r4, and the 2cv will always be classed as much better looking car, with a less complicated engine :) and a full length roof :)

the 2cv will always be the better car! french competition, ill go with citroen, probably the reason why im a 17yr old with 2 2cvs!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i dont quite see how the r4 can be compared to the 2cv, the 2cv came out in 1948, and was still in production in 1990! well untill july&#8230; but the r4 was just renaults answer to the 2cv, they even tried to give it a flat twin! and it has a dashboard mounted gear stick! which has always been the 2cvs original feature since the start, the 2cv had been around for over 20 years before renault came up with the r4, and the 2cv will always be classed as much better looking car, with a less complicated engine <img src='http://s.wordpress.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  and a full length roof <img src='http://s.wordpress.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>the 2cv will always be the better car! french competition, ill go with citroen, probably the reason why im a 17yr old with 2 2cvs!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
